GTA 6 Leak Returns With Nudity Clip, Rockstar Still Silent
A leaker calling themselves CyberLeek has resurfaced with a 25-minute GTA 6 clip full of nudity and dev-menu footage, and four outlets have now looked at it without a word from Rockstar.
We have waited years for an official release window on Grand Theft Auto VI, and this week what actually arrived was twenty five minutes of leaked footage with a fully nude Jason and a topless Lucia stamped with a watermark reading CyberLeek. That is the trade on offer right now: zero minutes of anything from Rockstar, twenty five minutes of something nobody at Rockstar authorized. Call that the information ratio of this leak cycle, and it is not a flattering one.
Eurogamer says it has viewed the clip and believes it legitimate, watermark and all, showing dirt-biking and a dev menu alongside the nude scenes. Rock Paper Shotgun independently describes the same footage, pointing out this is the most bare skin the series has shown on screen since San Andreas. LegacyKillaHD went further, calling the leak a DEFCON 1 moment for Rockstar. Three accounts, one clip. DarkViperAU had already flagged CyberLeek's possible return days earlier in a wider rumor roundup, tucked between a magazine breakdown and a mural sighting, which is how these things usually start now: a rumor roundup footnote that turns into the headline three days later.
What is actually confirmed here
- Eurogamer and Rock Paper Shotgun both describe viewing the same 25-minute clip, with matching detail on the nudity and the CyberLeek watermark.
- Neither Rockstar nor Take-Two has issued any statement on this clip as of this writing, in any of the four accounts.
- The identity of CyberLeek, whether a repeat leaker or a new party using the same handle, has not been confirmed by any outlet covering it.
The ledger stays open
A leak corroborated by three separate writeups is still a leak. It tells us the footage exists and that it was watermarked the same way as the earlier batch that reportedly got Rockstar and Take-Two chasing a leaker through the courts. It does not tell us a release date, a price, or whether any of this survives into the shipped game untouched. We have been burned before by treating leaked footage as a preview rather than as evidence in an ongoing dispute, and filing it as settled fact this time would cost us nothing except being wrong in public.
What would actually move this from leak to story is simple: a statement from Rockstar, even a terse one, confirming or denying what is in the clip. Until that lands, we keep the footage filed exactly where it belongs, as an unconfirmed leak with four names attached to the sighting and none attached to the source.